Poetry and Pragmatism
Harvard University Press, 1992 - 228 páginas
Richard Poirier, one of America's most eminent critics, reveals in this book the creative but mostly hidden alliance between American pragmatism and American poetry. He brilliantly traces pragmatism as a philosophical and literary practice grounded in a linguistic skepticism that runs from Emerson and William James to the work of Robert Frost, Gertrude Stein, and Wallace Stevens, and on to the cultural debates of today.
More powerfully than ever before, Poirier shows that pragmatism had its start in Emerson, the great example to all his successors of how it is possible to redeem even as you set out to change the literature of the past. Poirier demonstrates that Emerson--and later William James--were essentially philosophers of language, and that it is language that embodies our cultural past, an inheritance to be struggled with, and transformed, before being handed on to future generations. He maintains that in Emersonian pragmatist writing, any loss--personal or cultural--gives way to a quest for what he calls "superfluousness," a kind of rhetorical excess by which powerfully creative individuals try to elude deprivation and stasis. In a wide-ranging meditation on what James called "the vague," Poirier extols the authentic voice of individualism, which, he argues, is tentative and casual rather than aggressive and dogmatic.
The concluding chapters describe the possibilities for criticism created by this radically different understanding of reading and writing, which are nothing less than a reinvention of literary tradition itself. Poirier's discovery of this tradition illuminates the work of many of the most important figures in American philosophy and poetry. His reanimation of pragmatism also calls for a redirection of contemporary criticism, so that readers inside as well as outside the academy can begin to respond to poetic language as the source of meaning, not to meaning as the source of language.
Resultados 1-3 de 38
T . S . Eliot calls for a place in this particular cluster of writers which has never
adequately been given him , except for some mostly general remarks about the
evidences of Whitman in his poetry . He has been relegated , as indeed he asked
In that sense Shakespeare is the greatest writer of all time because he was also
the greatest reader of his own words , never oblivious to their implications no
matter how apparently at odds with his characterizations , never cheating on
When he found himself teaching The Waste Land , for example , Brower could
never read aloud the ending , “ Shanti shanti shanti , ” without showing evident
distaste . The Amherst people had a great poet - critic of their own , Robert Frost ...
Comentarios de la gente - Escribir un comentario
Poetry and pragmatismCrítica de los usuarios - Not Available - Book Verdict
Starting from the position of "linguistic skepticism,'' the view that language and the concept of truth are inadequate to the task of describing reality or containing experience, Poirer sees the ... Leer comentario completo
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
The Material Unconscious: American Amusement, Stephen Crane & the Economies ...
William Brown,Bill Brown
Vista previa limitada - 1996