Appeal to Popular OpinionPenn State Press, 2010 M11 1 |
Contenido
Why Do Public Opinion Polls Look Accurate? | 6 |
Worries of the Logic Textbooks | 13 |
The Meaning of Public Opinion | 19 |
The Problem with Arguments Based on Popular Opinion | 27 |
Chapter | 33 |
The Democratic Civilization Case | 41 |
The Falling Objects Case | 43 |
The Inquisition Case | 45 |
Deliberation | 184 |
Dialectical Relevance | 186 |
Relevance of Ad Populum Arguments | 188 |
Persuasion Dialogue and Public Policy | 191 |
The New Perspective on Evaluation | 193 |
Chapter Seven AD POPULUM SUBTYPES | 195 |
The MobAppeal Subtype | 196 |
The Pop Scheme | 199 |
The Mark Antony Case | 48 |
Inflammatory Language | 51 |
How the Ad Populum Is Used to Manipulate Opinions | 54 |
Appeal to Expert Opinion | 56 |
Chapter Three THE STANDARD TREATMENT | 61 |
Origins of the Ad Populum | 62 |
Early Modern Textbooks | 65 |
19351959 | 68 |
19611968 | 72 |
Cracks in the Surface 6 Broadening the Ad Populum | 77 |
The Dual Approach | 85 |
Multipliers | 88 |
The Unifying Form | 91 |
Summary of Developments | 94 |
Chapter Four PRESUMPTIONS COMMON STARTING POINTS AND PUBLIC JUDGMENT | 97 |
Bandwagon and MobAppeal Arguments | 98 |
Are Ad Populum Arguments Fallacious? | 100 |
Premise Adequacy of Dialectical Arguments | 103 |
Conflicts with Expert Opinion | 106 |
Common Starting Points | 109 |
The Status of Presumptions | 112 |
Presumptive Reasoning in Dialectical Arguments | 116 |
Popular Opinion and Common Knowledge | 119 |
Chapter Five THE OLD DIALECTIC | 129 |
Platonic Dialectic | 130 |
Aristotelian Dialectic | 133 |
Endoxic Premises | 138 |
Seneca on Ad Populum Arguments | 144 |
Eikotic Arguments | 148 |
The Medieval Period | 152 |
The Shift Away from Dialectic | 155 |
Consensus Gentium Arguments | 158 |
The Antiskeptical Dilemma and Pascals Wager | 161 |
Toward a New Dialectic | 166 |
Chapter Six THE NEW DIALECTIC | 169 |
Persuasion Dialogue | 171 |
The Inquiry | 175 |
Negotiations and Quarrels | 178 |
InformationSeeking Dialogue | 182 |
Position to Know | 201 |
Informed Deliberation | 205 |
Moral Justification | 207 |
Popular Sentiments | 209 |
Mass Opinion and Public Judgment | 212 |
The Rhetoric of Belonging | 217 |
Structure of the MobAppeal Subtype | 220 |
Summary of Subtypes | 223 |
Chapter Eight A NEW BASIS FOR EVALUATION | 229 |
Evaluation as Contextual | 230 |
Evaluation as Dependent on Identification | 232 |
Bolstering and Critical Questions | 234 |
Seeking a Basis for Acceptance in Persuasion Dialogue | 236 |
The Maxim of Nondisputativeness | 238 |
Dialectical Bias in Argumentation | 241 |
Mob Rhetoric and Mass Enthusiasm | 243 |
Appeal to Snobbery and Vanity | 247 |
Identification and Analysis | 249 |
The Four Steps of an Evaluation | 250 |
Chapter Nine WHEN IS IT A FALLACY? | 253 |
Public Opinion Polls and Fallacies | 257 |
Ad Populum Appeals in Commercial Ads | 261 |
34 | 263 |
Two Explanations of the Fallacy | 265 |
Hastily Jumping to a Conclusion | 267 |
Evaluating the Golden Rule Case | 269 |
Divisive Rhetoric in MobAppeal Arguments | 271 |
Three Types of Ad Populum Fallacy | 273 |
Evaluation for Fallaciousness | 274 |
277 | |
278 | |
283 | |
284 | |
285 | |
286 | |
287 | |
288 | |
289 | |
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
accept proposition According ad populum argument antiskeptical appeal to expert appeal to popular argument based argument from popularity argumentation scheme argumentum ad populum Aristotle audience bandwagon argument bandwagon fallacy bandwagon type basis believe bias burden of proof called Chapter characteristic cited commitments common-folks appeal conclusion context of dialogue critical discussion critical questions crowd defined deliberation dialectical argument dialectical exchange dialogue exchange emotional eristic dialogue evaluating ad populum evidence example expert opinion form of argument given Gricean maxim group G important inference inherently fallacious Inquisition irrelevant issue kind of argument knowledge logic textbooks Mark Antony ment mob appeal mob-appeal subtype mob-appeal type participants party persuasion dialogue plausible point of view pop scheme popular opinion populum appeal populum argument populum fallacy position to know problem public opinion relevant respondent rhetoric scientific seems Seneca Socrates Sophistical Refutations speaker speech standard treatment thesis type of argument type of dialogue Walton