...verbs, and in the forms of grammar, than could poffibly have been produced by accident ; fo ftrong, indeed, that no philologer could examine them all three without believing them to have fprung from fome common fource, which, perhaps, no longer exifts. There is a fimilar reafon, though...

...yet bearing to both of them a stronger ' affinity, both in the roots of the verbs and in the forms of ' grammar, than could possibly have been produced...three, without believing them to have sprung from some com' mon source, which, perhaps, no longer exists. There is a ' similar reason, though not quite so...

...either, yet bearing to both of them a stronger affinity, both ia ' the roots of verbs, and in the forms of grammar, than could ' possibly have been produced by accident ; so strong, indeed, ' that no philosopher could examine them all three, without be1 lieving them to have sprung from some common...

...either; yet bearing to both of them a stronger affinity, both in the roots of verbs and in the forms of grammar, than could possibly have been produced...indeed, that no philologer could examine them all without believing them to have sprung from some common source, which, perhaps, no longer exists. Thera...

...; a perusal of thenj will prove, that it was no less deep than miscelit, by conquerors from oilier kingdoms in some very remote age. The Sanscrit language,...not quite so forcible, for supposing that both. the Got/lick and Celtick, though blended with a very different idiom, had the same origin with the Sanscrit...

...stronger affinity, both in the roots of verbs, and in the form of grammar, than could possibly have bf en produced by accident; so strong indeed, that no philologer...forcible, for supposing that both the Gothick and Ccltick, though blended with a very different idiom, had the same origin with the Sanscrit ; and the...

...the forms of grammar, than could possibly have * See Analysis of Ancient Mythology, yol. iii. p. 30. been produced by accident; so strong indeed, that...not quite so forcible, for supposing that both the Gothic and Celtic, though blended with a very different idiom, had the same origin with the Sanscreet...

...Sanscrit was introduced into it, by conquerors from other kingdoms in some very remote age. The Sati;c;-k language, whatever be its antiquity, is of a wonderful...without believing them to have sprung from some common ioiircc, which perhaps no longer exists. There is a similar reason, though not quite so forcible, for...

...them a stronger affinity, both in the roots of verbs, and in the form of grammar, than could poisilily have been produced by accident; so strong indeed,...not quite so forcible, for supposing that both the Got/tick and Celtick, though blended with a very different idiom, had the same origin with the Sanscrit...

...refined than either; yet bearing to both a stronger affinity, both in the roots of verbs and in the forms of grammar, than could possibly have been produced...strong indeed that no philologer could examine them all without believing them to have come from one common source, which perhaps no longer exists. There is...